Comments on: Problem with mail delivery for customers with the SpamShield service http://blog.iweb.com/en/2009/06/problem-with-mail-delivery-for-customers-with-the-spamshield-service-3/2677.html iWeb's News, Updates and Notifications Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:45:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Martin Leclair http://blog.iweb.com/en/2009/06/problem-with-mail-delivery-for-customers-with-the-spamshield-service-3/2677.html/comment-page-1#comment-129964 Martin Leclair Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:05:08 +0000 http://blog.iweb.com/en/?p=2677#comment-129964 Some things like no subject and almost no text makes this message look like spam. The same person should try to send a normal mail with a subject and it should be accepted by the server. Some things like no subject and almost no text makes this message look like spam. The same person should try to send a normal mail with a subject and it should be accepted by the server.

]]> By: John Brigham http://blog.iweb.com/en/2009/06/problem-with-mail-delivery-for-customers-with-the-spamshield-service-3/2677.html/comment-page-1#comment-129883 John Brigham Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:56:15 +0000 http://blog.iweb.com/en/?p=2677#comment-129883 Please see the following header info and advise how it can be corrected. Note that the sending party is Re/Max of Fredericton and the receiving party is a Re/Max agent. Agent name is homes@nataliewebb.com. In other words the office cannot communicate to this agent and vice-versa. I have asked the hosting provider (webhost4life) to look into this and they point to iWeb's mail server as the problem... Inbox: ***SPAM*** (1 of 225) Mark as: Unseen Important Not Important Answered Unanswered Draft Not Draft Move | Copy This message to ---- New Folder ---- Inbox Drafts Sent Trash ---- homes@nataliewebb.com's Task List Back to Inbox Undelete | Reply | Forward | Redirect | View Thread | Blacklist | Whitelist | Message Source | Save as | Print Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:03:40 -0400 Envelope-to: homes@nataliewebb.com Received: from 058177247004.ctinets.com ([58.177.247.4] helo=tim.com) by s027.panelboxmanager.com with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MHUNK-00026T-8j for homes@nataliewebb.com; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:03:40 -0400 Return-path: Subject: ***SPAM*** X-Spam-Bar: +++++ X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "s027.panelboxmanager.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: test [...] Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header 0.0 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header 1.3 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3684] 2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header X-Spam-Score: 51 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.1 Headers: Show Limited Headers test Please see the following header info and advise how it can be corrected.
Note that the sending party is Re/Max of Fredericton and the receiving party is a Re/Max agent. Agent name is homes@nataliewebb.com. In other words the office cannot communicate to this agent and vice-versa. I have asked the hosting provider (webhost4life) to look into this and they point to iWeb’s mail server as the problem…

Inbox: ***SPAM*** (1 of 225)
Mark as: Unseen Important Not Important Answered Unanswered Draft Not Draft Move | Copy This message to —- New Folder —- Inbox Drafts Sent Trash —- homes@nataliewebb.com’s Task List Back to Inbox
Undelete | Reply | Forward | Redirect | View Thread | Blacklist | Whitelist | Message Source | Save as | Print
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:03:40 -0400
Envelope-to: homes@nataliewebb.com
Received: from 058177247004.ctinets.com ([58.177.247.4] helo=tim.com) by s027.panelboxmanager.com with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MHUNK-00026T-8j for homes@nataliewebb.com; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:03:40 -0400
Return-path:
Subject: ***SPAM***
X-Spam-Bar: +++++
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system “s027.panelboxmanager.com”, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn’t spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: test [...] Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description —- ———————- ————————————————– 0.0 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header 0.0 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header 1.3 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3684] 2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
X-Spam-Score: 51
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.1
Headers: Show Limited Headers

test

]]>