Blog
Forum
StatusProblem with mail delivery for customers with the SpamShield service
The Barracuda Anti-Spam unit has been replaced and all Spamshield services are running as usual at this time.
Comments
Leave a comment
Promotion
Highest Rated
- iWeb again in the top 10 ten of most reliable networks in November
- Top 9 Reasons why Web Hosting is Awesome
- An overview of RAID technology
- Who has the coolest costume?
- 4 Tools to Create A Website Quickly & Easily
- Season’s Greetings from iWeb!
- Securing Wordpress against hackers and bots
- Beware of the squirrel!
- iWeb on site for HostingCon 2009 in Washington DC
- iWeb Time Contest
June 24th, 2009 10:56 am
Please see the following header info and advise how it can be corrected.
Note that the sending party is Re/Max of Fredericton and the receiving party is a Re/Max agent. Agent name is homes@nataliewebb.com. In other words the office cannot communicate to this agent and vice-versa. I have asked the hosting provider (webhost4life) to look into this and they point to iWeb’s mail server as the problem…
Inbox: ***SPAM*** (1 of 225)
Mark as: Unseen Important Not Important Answered Unanswered Draft Not Draft Move | Copy This message to —- New Folder —- Inbox Drafts Sent Trash —- homes@nataliewebb.com’s Task List Back to Inbox
Undelete | Reply | Forward | Redirect | View Thread | Blacklist | Whitelist | Message Source | Save as | Print
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:03:40 -0400
Envelope-to: homes@nataliewebb.com
Received: from 058177247004.ctinets.com ([58.177.247.4] helo=tim.com) by s027.panelboxmanager.com with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MHUNK-00026T-8j for homes@nataliewebb.com; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:03:40 -0400
Return-path:
Subject: ***SPAM***
X-Spam-Bar: +++++
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system “s027.panelboxmanager.com”, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn’t spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: test [...] Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description —- ———————- ————————————————– 0.0 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header 0.0 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header 1.3 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3684] 2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
X-Spam-Score: 51
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.1
Headers: Show Limited Headers
test
June 25th, 2009 10:05 am
Some things like no subject and almost no text makes this message look like spam. The same person should try to send a normal mail with a subject and it should be accepted by the server.